Independent MP Pappu Yadav faces escalating controversy over his remarks on women in politics. A JD(U) leader has filed an FIR application, citing the comments as defamatory and an attack on women’s dignity. The Bihar State Women’s Commission has issued a notice seeking an explanation. Yadav offered a conditional apology, stating his intent was to expose exploitation.
Patna: The controversy surrounding Independent MP Rajesh Ranjan alias Pappu Yadav’s remarks on women in politics continues to escalate with a written application demanding registration of an FIR submitted at Shastri Nagar police station in Patna.The application was filed by Reena Kumari Chaudhary, JD(U) state secretary and a resident of Teghra in Begusarai district, who described the MP’s comments as hurtful, obscene and defamatory.In her written application, Reena said the statements represent a direct attack on the character, self-respect and social dignity of all women participating in the political and public sphere. She further argued by linking the success of self-reliant women to sexual exploitation, the MP has insulted women’s dignity and created a hostile and discouraging environment for those aspiring to serve the country.In her plea, she requested registration of an FIR against Pappu. Police have assured her of immediate action.Saket Kumar, SDPO II of Secretariat, said the application was received on Friday and further investigation is underway. “The FIR has not been registered yet as the police are verifying all the information,” he said.The remarks have drawn sharp criticism from various quarters, including women BJP legislators who demanded a public apology, calling the comments reflective of a malicious mindset.
The Bihar State Women’s Commission also took suo motu cognisance and issued a notice to Pappu, seeking an explanation within three days while warning of potential recommendations for action against his parliamentary membership.
The commission also issued a notice on Wednesday directing Pappu to appear before the BSWC and submit his statement along with evidence on April 30.In response to the backlash, the MP later offered a conditional apology, expressing regret if his words had hurt women politicians or “sisters and daughters”, while maintaining his intention was to expose exploitation in politics and protect women’s dignity.
