BHOPAL: In an intriguing twist to the death of a 30-year-old man inside the core area of Pench Tiger Reserve in Madhya Pradesh’s Seoni district, a debate is now gaining ground if he was killed by a tiger, as was widely reported, or murdered.Amid contrasting theories put forward within forest circles, some officials are calling for a deeper forensic scrutiny to check for homicide even as field officers maintain it was a ‘clear case’ of a tiger attack.At the centre of the debate is the nature of injuries, especially severe trauma to the neck, and the fact that the body was not consumed.A section of officials says such patterns can still fall within the ambit of known tiger behaviour, especially in territorial or defensive encounters.However, another section put forward a contrarian view saying they believe the circumstances around the incident warrant a thorough scientific examination before drawing firm conclusions.A retired IFS officer, speaking on condition of anonymity, questioned the rush to attribute the death to a tiger kill. “Why should a tiger be blamed every time? First of all, they should verify whether the person was killed in atiger attack or by someone else.
The injury doesn’t appear to be one inflicted by a tiger,” he said.Adding weight to the counter view, other officials pointed to the tiger’s sheer killing capability. A full-grown tiger can exert a bite force estimated at over 1,000 PSI (pounds per square inch), powerful enough to crush bone and snap the neck or spine of prey within seconds. Experts say such force can result in catastrophic neck injuries, including dislocation or nearseverance.Some officers argued that in sensitive cases, especially those occurring inside prohibited core areas, conclusions must be backed by strong field and forensic evidence to rule out all possibilities, including non-wildlife factors.But others insisted that the available indicators areconsistent with a natural tiger encounter, cautioning against overcomplicating what appears to be a straightforward case.According to an official release issued on April 14, 2026, the incident came to light during a routine patrol on April 13 in the Gumtara Game Range under Naharjhir Beat (Compartment No. 1421). The patrol team left around 3.30 pm and reached the Shergarhaddha water source at about 4.45 pm.Officials said blood stains were first spotted on a rock near the waterhole, prompting a detailed search. The mutilated body of the victim was found about 150 metres away, while a tiger was sighted approximately 200 metres from the location.The deceased was identified as Dinesh Sewatkar, a resident of Naharjhir villagewho was undergoing treatment for mental illness. Authorities confirmed he had entered the restricted core area.Despite norms that typically exclude compensation for incidents inside core zones, officials said processes involved in extending relief were being initiated on humanitarian grounds.According to wildlife experts, water sources during peak summer act as high-risk zones where predators and prey converge.
Tigers often lie in wait near such locations, and any sudden human presence can trigger an instinctive attack, they opined.Pench authorities said extensive awareness efforts are already underway to prevent future strayings into core areas and such incidents. These include ‘Tiger Chaupals’ in buffer villages, engagement with over 126 Eco-Development Committees, and mobile outreach campaigns such as “Sayane Mogli Ki Cycle”.Surveillance has also been strengthened through AI-enabled and motion-sensor cameras, along with elephant patrols in sensitive zones.Officials have reiterated standing advisories for villagers, particularly during mahua collection season, urging them to move in groups, avoid deep forest areas, maintain communication and strictly stay out of the core zone.
